Wir verwenden Cookies, um für diese Website Funktionen wie z.B. Login, einen Warenkorb oder die Sprachwahl zu ermöglichen. Weiterhin nutzen wir für anonymisierte, statistische Auswertungen der Nutzung Google Analytics, welches Cookies setzt. Mehr Informationen finden Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung.
OK, ich bin einverstanden Ich möchte keine Google Analytics-Cookies
International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry  (English Edition)



Kennwort vergessen?


Int J Esthet Dent 10 (2015), Nr. 1     9. Feb. 2015
Int J Esthet Dent 10 (2015), Nr. 1  (09.02.2015)

Seite 122-145, PubMed:25625130, Sprache: Englisch

Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results
Paula, Eloisa Andrade de / Tay, Lidia Yileng / Kose, Carlos / Mena-Serrano, Alexandra / Reis, Alessandra / Perdigão, Jorge / Loguercio, Alessandro D.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the 6- and 12-month clinical performance of four adhesion strategies from the same manufacturer (Kerr) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Thirty-five patients, with at least four NCCLs each, participated in this study. After samplesize calculation, 180 restorations were assigned to one of the following groups: OFL (Optibond FL), OSP (Optibond Solo Plus), XTR (Optibond XTR), and AIO (Optibond All-In-One). The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months, using both the FDI and the USPHS-modified criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures, ANOVA by rank, and the McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Six restorations (2 for OFL, 1 for OSP, 2 for XTR, and 1 for AIO) were lost at 12 months (P > 0.05 for both evaluation criteria). Marginal staining was observed in seven restorations using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05) and three restorations using the USPHSmodified criteria (P > 0.05). Eight restorations (2 for OSP, 3 for XTR, and 3 for AIO) were classified as Bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHSmodified criteria (P > 0.05). However, 62 restorations (14 for OFL, 12 for OSP, 15 for XTR, and 21 for AIO) were classified as Bravo using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05). The four adhesion strategies showed similar clinical retention at 6 and 12 months. The FDI evaluation criteria tend to be more sensitive than the USPHS-modified criteria.
Volltext (keine Berechtigung) einzeln als PDF kaufen (20.00 €)Endnote-Export